Return to CreateDebate.comhunter8e • Join this debate community

Hunter 8E

Welcome to Hunter 8E!

Hunter 8E is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.

Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.

Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!

Report This User
Permanent Delete

View All

View All

View All

RSS Daniel151

Reward Points:0
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
Efficiency Monitor

9 most recent arguments.
0 points

Closing Statement: The Second Amendment still shouldn't be updated for it wouldn't change anything and would make defending yourself much more difficult. Guns give the citizens a sense of safety and protection compared to other ways. In the end, having guns is better than not

-1 points

London might take over New York in murder rates a gun from a country which has banned guns to USA

Supporting Evidence: Source (
1 point

It is not 65% of shooting and deaths are done by a firearm, 65% of murders are done by a fire arm.

1 point

Wikipedia still gets updated constantly just incase incidents like these ever happen and bans users for editing something to make it unreliable

0 points

Arguement 2 : There would be no change in access to guns by banning them from normal citizens and having only restricted to the army. It is the same with drugs, millions of people get access to them even though they are banned even 36.8 millions kids aged 12 and up had access to drugs and in 2004 there were only 12,116 arrests. What would stop an equal amount of people getting access to guns and committing a mass shooting. Also, wouldn’t the crime rate go up if there are tons of people getting in trouble for having a gun or doing something wrong with it.

Supporting Evidence: Source/Link (
-1 points

Of those 32,000 some of them are suicides which could be done in different ways from your source

1 point

Although we have access to much more dangerous weaponry the most common form of assault is a handgun not a machine gun which would only be used for mass shootings and handguns appear more often than other guns

Supporting Evidence: source (
1 point

The posted statement has been posted with no evidence provided to prove what you have said is true, so therefore it is currently false.

1 point

The posted statement has been posted with no evidence provided to prove what you have said is true, so therefore it is currently false.

Daniel151 has not yet created any debates.

About Me

I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!

Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here